NATIONAL NETWORK TRAFFIC VICTIMS FAMILY REPORTS: Again sending mom Susana Sanchez Damian Rodriguez, from the `Pampa send us material on developments in the powers of Federal Court of provincia.transitoporlavida @ yahoo.com.arwww.transitoporlavida.blogspot.com "Hacete friend of the judge"
A palpable uneasiness felt in the atmosphere of a federal court in our province. Admission to finger two children of a maid called, ignoring any proceedings for selection of applicants was not very well digested by those who work in that jurisdiction.
The "little help" given to Judge pampas has high-flying, nothing less than the Supreme Court, where its president validated by his signature such irregular income, one in the Federal Court of Santa Rosa and the rest in the Oral Tribunal Criminal 2 in Cordoba.
information published by this newspaper on Saturday and still no one, in the judicial field, has felt obliged to say anything. It is a silence that validates an apparent irregularity and to accept as natural that in an area where the suitability of the entrants should be a careful and rigorous selection can proceed with such astonishing nonchalance.
"Hacete friend of the judge," he joked in his unforgettable José Hernández Martín Fierro. In this case is now known that saying can be applied with a small difference: where it says "friend" should read "son."
most outrageous thing that makes this abuse is the ease with which it is committed and the fact it occurs twice: leave an appointment in Santa Rosa and one in Cordoba, seem to say the two signed resolutions and surely the same day in the same act, "the President of the SCJ to the delight of dad judge and ridicule of the majesty of justice.
Not least the fact One of the offshoots is currently on trial for manslaughter in the regular courts by staging an accident that cost the death of a 19 year old. That case is delayed because they have been given to the son of Judge procedural benefit-it appears-not applicable. Another grace for those who belong to the "family court."
If there is a place in the state where income should never occur because of blood-expressly prohibited by national and provincial constitutions is precisely in court. This is an area where the suitability, training and conditions and personal background of entrants should be very severely tested more demanding than any other government department. We're talking about people who play in the power of the State judging and, eventually, condemns the rest of mortals under their discretion.
Dodging a contest to accommodate a family in the state is reprehensible. But more seriously in the courts, and worse if the maneuver is committed nothing less than a judge, who should be ultimate example of righteousness in their actions as one who judges his fellow man.
By what authority a judge may try and give "to each his due" if he assumes a right that the law does not give you and jump over the rules governing access to public office. Arena fuente.La
0 comments:
Post a Comment